Valuating Indonesian Upstream Oil Management Scenario through System Dynamics Modelling

Fariza Aulia Putri, I Ketut Gunarta
Submission Date: 2017-07-28 11:20:00
Accepted Date: 2018-01-09 21:27:32


Under the existing regulation in Constitution Number 22 Year 2001 (UU No 22 Tahun 2001), Production Sharing Contract (PSC) continues to be the scenario in conducting oil and gas upstream mining activities as the previous regulation (UU No. 8 Tahun 1971). Because of the high costs and risks in upstream mining activities, the contractors are dominated by foreign companies, meanwhile National Oil Company (NOC) doesn’t act much. The domination of foreign contractor companies also warned Indonesia in several issues addressing to energy independence and energy security. Therefore, to achieve the goals of energy which is independence and security, there need to be a revision in upstream oil activities regulating scenario. The scenarios will be comparing the current scenario, which is PSC, with the “full concession” scenario for National Oil Company (NOC) in managing oil upstream mining activities. Both scenario will be modelled using System Dynamics methodology and assessed furthermore using financial valuation method of income approach. Under the 2 scenarios, the author will compare which scenario is better for upstream oil management in reaching the goals mentioned before and more profitable in financial aspect. From the simulation, it is gathered that concession scenario offers better option than PSC in reaching energy independence and energy security.


Upstream Oil Management; Energy Independence; Energy Security; System Dynamics Methodology; Financial Valuation


Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Republic of

Indonesia, 2016. Handbooko of Energy & Economic

Statistics of Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusdatin ESDM.

Abbaszadeh, P., Maleki, A., Alipour, M. & Maman, Y. K.,

Iran's Oil Development Scenarios by 2025. Elsevier.

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2014. Jumlah Perusahaan Industri 2008-2014. s.l.:s.n.

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2014. Perkembangan Jumlah

Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis, 1949-2014. s.l.:s.n.

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2015. Jumlah Perusahaan Industri di Indonesia Berdasarkan Skala Usaha. s.l.:Pusdatin Kemenperin.

Baruza, M. C., 2015. System Dynamic Approach for

Transportation Sector Development based on Calculation

of Investment of Surabaya Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT),

Surabaya: ITS.

Boston University School of Management, 2016.

Techniques in Finance & Valuation, Boston: Boston


BPPT, 2015. Indonesia Energy Outlook 2016, Jakarta:

Center for Technology of Energy Resources and Chemical

Industry BPPT.

British Petroleum, 2016. BP Statistical Review of World

Energy, London: British Petroleum.

Eslamifar, G., MohammadShirazi, A. & Mashayekhi, A.

N., n.d. A System Dynamics Model to Achieve Sustainable

Production of Oil in Iran.

Hitchner, J. R., 2011. Financial Valuation Applications

and Models 3rd Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,


Indirasardjana, P., 2014. Minyak untuk Presiden. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Kiani, B., Hosseini, S. H. & Amiri, R. H., 2009. Examining the Hubbert Peak of Iran's Crude Oil: A System. European Journal of Scientific Research, Volume 25.

Lubiantara, B., 2012. Ekonomi Migas. Jakarta: PT

Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Muhammadi, Aminullah, E. & Soesilo, B., 2001. Analisis Sistem Dinamis. Jakarta: UMJ Press.

Nugroho, A. S., 2015. Analisis Ketahanan Minyak di 15

Negara Pengimpor Minyak Tahun 2010. Volume 19.

Pratiwi, A. A., 2016. Selection of Strategy Scenario to

Enhance the Competitive Advantage of Surabaya, East

Java's Shipbuilding Industrial Cluster (KIKAS), Surabaya:


Prawoto, A., 2004. Penilaian Usaha. Jogjakarta: BPFE


PT Pertamina (Persero), 2015. Annual Report 2015:

Reenergizing Spirit, Strengthening Commitments, Jakarta:

PT Pertamina (Persero).

PT Pertamina EP, 2016. Integrated Annual Report 2015: Beyond Challenge, Strengthening Strategy, Jakarta: PT Pertamina EP.

PT Pertamina Hulu Energi, 2015. Integrated Annual

Report 2015: Overcoming Challenges for a Better Future,

Jakarta: PT Pertamina Hulu Energi.

PT. Pertamina (Persero), 2016. Energia. Desember ed.

Jakarta: Corporate Communcation PT. Pertamina


Richardson, G. P., 2016. Model Validation Outlined by

Forrester and Senge, New York: Rockefeller College of

Public Affairs and Policy, University at Albany - State

University of New York.

SKK Migas, 2015. Annual Report 2015. Jakarta: s.n.

SKK Migas, 2016. Buletin SKK Migas. Jakarta: s.n.

SPE, AAPG, WPC, SPEE, 2011. Petroleum Resources

Management System 2011, s.l.: SPE, AAPG, WPC, SPEE.

Sulistiyono, 2011. Analisa Kelayakan Penambahan Sumur Produksi Minyak dan Gas Bumi (Studi Kasus PT. Conoco Philips Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah MTG, Volume 4.

Wirjodirdjo, B., 2012. Pengantar Metodologi Sistem

Dinamik. Surabaya: ITS Press.

Full Text: PDF

CC Licencing

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Teknik ITS by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, LPPM-ITS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Statistik Pengunjung